What Games Do Scientists Play? Rationality and Objectivity in a Game-Theoretic Approach to the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge

In M. Dorato M. Suàrez, Epsa Epistemology and Methodology of Science. Springer. pp. 323--332 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

View all bargains

Buy this book

Find it on Amazon.com

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Science as a Persuasion Game: An Inferentialist Approach.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2006 - Episteme 2 (3):189-201.
The Typology of the Game that American, British, and Danish Crop and Plant Scientists Play.Mercy W. Kamara - 2009 - Minerva 47 (4):441-463.
Game-theoretic axioms for local rationality and bounded knowledge.Gian Aldo Antonelli & Cristina Bicchieri - 1995 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 4 (2):145-167.
Information Tracking in Games on Graphs.Dietmar Berwanger & Łukasz Kaiser - 2010 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 19 (4):395-412.
Evolutionary games without rationality?Martin Bunzl - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (3):365-378.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-27

Downloads
60 (#1,003,396)

6 months
10 (#1,122,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Thinking about mechanisms.Peter Machamer, Lindley Darden & Carl F. Craver - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (1):1-25.
Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized.James Ladyman & Don Ross - 2007 - In James Ladyman & Don Ross, Every thing must go: metaphysics naturalized. New York: Oxford University Press.
A confutation of convergent realism.Larry Laudan - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (1):19-49.

View all 90 references / Add more references