Neurotechnology Governance in the United States: Gaps and Opportunities

Bioethics 40 (2):225-235 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Neuroscience's accelerating advances have reached a pivotal point in the study of the human brain, including neurotechnologies capable of recording large amounts of data and acting with greater precision. However, the use of neurotechnology has raised a number of ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI). To that end, sufficiently robust policy and governance structures must be considered. To date, no published review of United States policies governing neuroscience and neurotechnology exists. To address this, we review US polices and various ethical frameworks overseeing neuroscience and neurotechnology. This policy review highlights where gaps in neuroscience and neurotechnology policy and governance might exist. Overall, our review shows that “soft policies” make up the present-day US neurotech-governance universe at the federal level, with neurodata specific state-legislation emerging. The included analysis can aid researchers, technology developers, neuroethicists, research ethicists, legal scholars, and others in facilitating ethically and socially responsible implementation of neuroscience and neurotechnology as they move from “bench to bedside and beyond.”

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In Defense of the Cultural Insensitivity of Neurorights.Shu Ishida & Ryuma Shineha - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (4):385-387.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-11-29

Downloads
47 (#1,235,704)

6 months
44 (#192,420)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?