The Mohist Notion of Gongyi

Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 19 (2):269-287 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Mohists develop the concept of yi 義 to denote what is morally right in a normative sense. We argue that this concept has, as one of its necessary conditions, a requirement to not harm others. Additionally, we will show that the motivation of developing this concept is that it can be both universalized and publicly agreed upon, thus serving the Mohists’ endeavor to overcome human conflicts that make the world chaotic and unlivable. We argue therefore that the Mohist notion of gongyi 公義 is best captured by the requirement of “not harming.” Moreover, we shall show that the Mohists themselves committed to this requirement as the first principle of all their core doctrines. Finally, we argue that due to the justifiability and universalizability of the requirement of “not harming,” the Mohists’ commitment to it as a prerequisite normatively justifies their other values in a way that was unprecedented at the time.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Mohist Care.Dan Robins - 2012 - Philosophy East and West 62 (1):60-91.
Semantics without Truth in Later Mohist Philosophy of Language.Frank Saunders - 2014 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13 (2):215-229.
Realism and Conventionalism in Later Mohist Semantics.Daniel J. Stephens - 2017 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 16 (4):521-542.
On the Argument for Jian’ai.Hui-Chieh Loy - 2013 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 12 (4):487-504.
Chapter 6: Mohists (mojia) and mohist teachings.Helmolt Vittinghoff - 2001 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 28 (1&2):160–164.
Jian ai and the Mohist attack of Early Confucianism.Wai Wai Chiu - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (5):425-437.
Mohist Approach To The Rule-following Problem.Chung-I. Lin - 2013 - Comparative Philosophy 4 (2):41-66.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-03

Downloads
518 (#104,747)

6 months
180 (#63,585)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Amin Ebrahimi Afrouzi
University of California, Los Angeles

Citations of this work

Mohism.Chris Fraser - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Mozi and Inclusive Care.Michael Hemmingsen - 2024 - In Ethical Theory in Global Perspective. Seattle, WA: SUNY Press. pp. 143-158.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A source book in Chinese philosophy.Wing-Tsit Chan - 1963 - Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Edited by Wing-Tsit Chan.
Mencius and early Chinese thought.Kwong-loi Shun - 1997 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
The Complete Works of Zhuangzi.Burton Watson (ed.) - 2013 - Columbia University Press.

View all 24 references / Add more references