Still resisting: replies to my critics

Metascience 29 (1):33-40 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a reply piece to a series of book symposium contributions to my book, Resisting Scientific Realism. The contributions were by Steven French, Peter Vickers, Stathis Psillos, and Kyle Stanford.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11016-020-00490-7

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

K. Brad Wray: Resisting Scientific Realism, Book Review. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 2018.Ragnar van der Merwe - 2020 - Journal for the General Philosophy of Science 51 (4):637-641.
Resisting scientific anti-realism: K. Brad Wray: Resisting scientific realism. Cambridge University Press, 2018, 224pp, $105 HB. [REVIEW]Peter Vickers - 2020 - Metascience 29 (1):11-16.
Resisting scientific anti-realism: K. Brad Wray. Resisting scientific realism. Cambridge University Press, 2018, 224 pp, $105 HB.Stathis Psillos - 2020 - Metascience 29 (1):17-24.
Resisting Scientific Realism with or Without van Fraassen’s Darwinian Explanation: K. Brad Wray: Resisting Scientific Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, 224pp, $105 HB. [REVIEW]P. Kyle Stanford - 2020 - Metascience 29 (1):25-31.
Darwinian-Selectionist Explanation, Radical Theory Change, and the Observable-Unobservable Dichotomy.Elay Shech - 2021 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 34 (4):221-241.
Resisting Scientific Realism by K. Brad Wray.Samuel Ruhmkorff - 2019 - British Journal for Philosophy of Science Review of Books 1.
Resistance is futile!: K. Brad Wray: Resisting scientific realism, Cambridge University Press, 2018, 224 pp, $105 HB. [REVIEW]Steven French - 2020 - Metascience 29 (1):5-10.
K. Brad Wray, "Resisting Scientific Realism." Reviewed by.Robert Hudson - 2019 - Philosophy in Review 39 (4):224-226.
Induction, Rationality, and the Realism/Anti-realism Debate: A Reply to Shech.K. Brad Wray - 2022 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 34 (4):243-247.
Resisting Scientific Realism, by K. Brad Wray: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2018, Pp. xii + 224. [REVIEW]Elay Shech - 2020 - Philosophia 48 (2):861-866.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-15

Downloads
254 (#163,277)

6 months
44 (#192,420)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Photo of K. Brad Wray
K. Brad Wray
Aarhus University

Citations of this work

Darwinian-Selectionist Explanation, Radical Theory Change, and the Observable-Unobservable Dichotomy.Elay Shech - 2021 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 34 (4):221-241.
Running Mice and Successful Theories: The Limitations of a Classical Analogy.Matthias Egg & August Hämmerli - 2024 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 55 (3):309-326.
Induction, Rationality, and the Realism/Anti-realism Debate: A Reply to Shech.K. Brad Wray - 2022 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 34 (4):243-247.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Scientific Image.William Demopoulos & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (4):603.
A confutation of convergent realism.Larry Laudan - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (1):19-49.
A Confutation of Convergent Realism.Larry Laudan - 2001 - In Yuri Balashov & Alex Rosenberg, Philosophy of Science: Contemporary Readings. New York: Routledge. pp. 211.
Understanding Inconsistent Science.Peter Vickers - 2013 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.

View all 8 references / Add more references