Nanoscale Science and Technology and People with Disabilities in Asia: An Ability Expectation Analysis [Book Review]

NanoEthics 6 (2):127-135 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Science and technology, including nanoscale science and technology, influences and is influenced by various discourses and areas of action. Ableism is one concept and ability expectation is one dynamic that impacts the direction, vision, and application of nanoscale science and technology and vice versa. At the same time, policy documents that involve or relate to disabled people exhibit ability expectations of disabled people. The authors present ability expectations exhibited within two science and technology direction documents from Asia, as well as in two policy documents generated and influenced by disabled people from Asia. As well, the authors discuss the impact of the ability expectations exhibited in these four documents with respect to the relationship between science and technology and disabled people

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-10

Downloads
205 (#196,889)

6 months
19 (#570,736)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Ethics and Education.A. J. D. Porteous - 1967 - British Journal of Educational Studies 15 (1):75.
Ethics and Education.Richard Stanley Peters - 1966 - London,: Routledge.
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.United Nations - 2009 - Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft Und Ethik 14 (1):203-226.
Response to Mark Kuczewski.Peter Singer - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (3):55-56.
Invoking the Law in Ethics Consultation.Bethany Spielman - 1993 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2 (4):457.

View all 11 references / Add more references