Deep Anthropology

Environmental Ethics 8 (3):261-270 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Deep ecology has been criticized for being anti-anthropocentric, ignorant of feminism, and utopian. Most of the arguments against deep ecology, however, are based on uncritical use of these terms. Deep ecology places anthropocentrism, feminism, and utopianism into a proper perspective--deep anthropology-which pennits understanding of the human relationships with other beings in nature, in a total-fieldmodel, without accepting unhealthy extremes. The principles of deep ecology are concerned with creating good places, rather than the “no places” of modem industrial cultures.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review of How Deep is Deep Ecology? [REVIEW]Richard Watson - 1990 - Environmental Ethics 12 (4):371-374.
Eco-Feminism and Deep Ecology.Jim Cheney - 1987 - Environmental Ethics 9 (2):115-145.
Deeper than Deep Ecology.Ariel Kay Salleh - 1984 - Environmental Ethics 6 (4):339-345.
Is There an Ecofeminism–Deep Ecology “Debate”?Deborah Slicer - 1995 - Environmental Ethics 17 (2):151-169.
A Defence of the Deep Ecology Movement.Arne Naess - 1984 - Environmental Ethics 6 (3):265-270.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-01

Downloads
113 (#425,607)

6 months
24 (#434,395)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Anthropocentrism as the scapegoat of the environmental crisis: a review.Laÿna Droz - 2022 - Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 22:25-49.
The Values of a Habitat.Kelly Parker - 1990 - Environmental Ethics 12 (4):353-368.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references