Peer-Review Assignments

Teaching Philosophy 29 (4):327-342 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Most philosophy professors want to help their students improve their writing, but determining a good way to do so is not easy. Requiring students to write rough drafts is a good start, but the extra work these require can overload already busy professors. In this article I describe and defend the use of peer-review assignments as a way of improving undergraduate writing. The largest benefit of such assignments is that they allow the students to take a more objective view of their own writing. I also provide sample questionsto use in such assignments.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Levi's decision theory.Stephen Leeds - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (1):158-168.
The principles and practices of Peer review.Ronald N. Kostoff - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):19-34.
A Puzzle About Ineffable Propositions.Agustín Rayo - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (2):289 - 295.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
133 (#335,292)

6 months
30 (#301,521)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Fair Grades.Daryl Close - 2009 - Teaching Philosophy 32 (4):361-398.
Short Writing Assignments in Philosophy.Daniel Weltman - 2024 - American Association of Philosophy Teachers Studies in Pedagogy 9:149-171.
Skill Building in Large Classes.Alex Koo - 2024 - Teaching Philosophy 47 (4):545-568.
Annotated Bibliography.Sarah K. Donovan & Renée J. Smith - 2024 - American Association of Philosophy Teachers Studies in Pedagogy 9:223-248.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references