Inequalities in health and intergenerational equity

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (1):47-55 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the popular folklore three-score-years-and-ten is treated as a fair innings for people, and thereby serves as an informal reference point for judgements about distributive justice within a community. But length of life alone is an insufficient basis for such judgements - a person's health-related quality-of-life also needs to be taken into account. If one of the objectives of public policy is to reduce inequalities in lifetime health, it will be demonstrated that this is very likely to require systematic discrimination against the older members of a community. The notion of community solidatity will also be tested, because a decision will need to be made as to whether the same fair innings applies to all members of the community, or whether some are entitled to more than others. The strength of the fair innings principle is that it brings these issues to the fore in a systematic way which should ais their resolition in a practical context.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
128 (#354,449)

6 months
15 (#771,617)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

More and Better Justice.John Harris - 1988 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series 23:75-96.
Philosophy and Medical Welfare.John Martin Bell & Susan Mendus - 1989 - Cambridge University Press.

Add more references