Edward Stillingfleet’s theological critique of Cartesian natural philosophy

History of European Ideas 46 (8):1150-1164 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this article I examine Edward Stillingfleet’s last published work and the critique of Rene Descartes’s natural philosophy therein which appeared in 1702 as an incomplete appendix to the revised edition of his well-known Origines Sacrae to explore the depiction of God’s power that underwrote his assessment of Cartesianism mechanical philosophy and its inclination to atheism. I consider both Stillingfleet’s characterization of God’s relationship with the creation and the contextual sources he used to support it, to show that his refutation of Descartes’s work was wrapped in the language of voluntarist theology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Berkeley’s Lockean Religious Epistemology.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2014 - Journal of the History of Ideas 75 (3):417-438.
Descartes and Voetius on the Innate Knowledge of God and the Limits of Natural Theology.Mihai-Dragoș Vădana - 2017 - Annals of the University of Bucharest - Philosophy Series 65 (2).
Descartes, Spacetime, and Relational Motion.Edward Slowik - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (1):117-139.
Reason, Nature, and God in Descartes.Gary Hatfield - 1993 - In Stephen Voss, Essays on the philosophy and science of René Descartes. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 259–287.
Kant and the Laws of Nature ed. by Michela Massimi, Angela Breitenbach. [REVIEW]Reed Winegar - 2018 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 56 (2):377-378.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-17

Downloads
44 (#1,295,554)

6 months
8 (#1,303,858)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?