Transnational partisanship: idea and practice

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (3):377-400 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

That parties might successfully organize transnationally is an idea often met with scepticism. This article argues that while certain favourable conditions are indeed absent in the transnational domain, this implies not that partisanship is impossible but that it is likely to be marked by certain traits. Specifically, it will tend to be episodic, structured as a low-density network and delocalized in its ideational content. These tendencies affect the normative expectations one can attach to it. Transnational partisanship should be valued as a transitional phenomenon, e.g. as a pathway to transnational democracy, more than as a desirable thing in itself.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-14

Downloads
91 (#591,708)

6 months
25 (#388,002)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Populism and technocracy: opposites or complements?Christopher Bickerton & Carlo Invernizzi Accetti - 2017 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (2):186-206.
The Politics of Peoplehood.Jonathan White & Lea Ypi - 2017 - Political Theory 45 (4):439-465.
A Deliberative Model of Intra‐Party Democracy.Fabio Wolkenstein - 2015 - Journal of Political Philosophy 24 (3):297-320.
Principled disobedience in the EU.Jonathan White - 2017 - Constellations 24 (4):637-649.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations