- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Planning, control, and the illusion of explanation
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):54-55 (2004)
Abstract
Several aspects of Glover's planning–control model (PCM) appear incompatible with existing data. Moreover, there is no logical reason to suppose that separate visual representations should be required for the “planning” and “control” of actions in the first place. Although intuitively appealing, the PCM appears to lack strong empirical support.Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Planning differences for chromaticity- and luminance-defined stimuli: A possible problem for Glover's planning–control model.Charles E. Wright & Charles Chubb - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):55-56.
Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action.Scott Glover - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):3-24.
Planning and controlling action in a structured environment: Visual illusion without dorsal stream.Yann Coello & Yves Rossetti - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):29-31.
Scale errors by very young children: A dissociation between action planning and control.Judy S. DeLoache - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):32-33.
The planning–control model and spatio-motor deficits following brain damage.H. Branch Coslett & Laurel J. Buxbaum - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):31-32.
The planning and control model (PCM) of motorvisual priming: Reconciling motorvisual impairment and facilitation effects.Roland Thomaschke, Brian Hopkins & R. Christopher Miall - 2012 - Psychological Review 119 (2):388-407.
At least some electrophysiological and behavioural data cannot be reconciled with the planning–control model.P. Paolo Battaglini, Paolo Bernardis & Nicola Bruno - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):24-25.
How are cognition and movement control related to each other?Maurizio Gentilucci & Sergio Chieffi - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):36-37.
Further evidence for, and some against, a planning–control dissociation.Paul van Donkelaar & Paul R. Dassonville - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):52-53.
Defining visuomotor dissociations and an application to the oculomotor system.Bruce Bridgeman - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):27-28.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
94 (#563,893)
6 months
14 (#827,216)
2009-01-28
Downloads
94 (#563,893)
6 months
14 (#827,216)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Use of remote data collection methodology to test for an illusory effect on visually guided cursor movements.Ryan W. Langridge & Jonathan J. Marotta - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation