The St. Petersburg gamble and risk

Theory and Decision 17 (2):193-202 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One resolution of the St. Petersburg paradox recognizes that a gamble carries a risk sensitive to the gamble's stakes. If aversion to risk increases sufficiently fast as stakes go up, the St. Petersburg gamble has a finite utility.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-04

Downloads
144 (#299,765)

6 months
20 (#533,870)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Weirich
University of Missouri, Columbia

Citations of this work

Infinite Ethics.Nick Bostrom - 2011 - Analysis and Metaphysics 10:9–59.
Waging War on Pascal’s Wager.Alan Hájek - 2003 - Philosophical Review 112 (1):27-56.
Infinity.Kenny Easwaran, Alan Hájek, Paolo Mancosu & Graham Oppy - 2021 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The future of humanity.Nick Bostrom - 2009 - In Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis, Evan Selinger & Søren Riis, New waves in philosophy of technology. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 551–557.
The St. Petersburg Paradox.Martin Peterson - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Foundations of Statistics.Leonard Savage - 1954 - Wiley Publications in Statistics.
The Logic of Decision.Richard C. Jeffrey - 1965 - New York, NY, USA: University of Chicago Press.
The Foundations of Statistics.Leonard J. Savage - 1954 - Synthese 11 (1):86-89.
The Foundations of Statistics.Leonard J. Savage - 1956 - Philosophy of Science 23 (2):166-166.

View all 12 references / Add more references