Abstract

This chapter introduces the broadly _semantical_ issues that are the focus of Part I of the book: how are we to give an account of the _meaning_ of normative statements, and of the nature of the mental states (‘normative judgments’) that such statements express? Sections 1.1 and 1.2 clarify the sort of (non-circular but not necessarily reductive) account that is needed. Then the remaining sections argue that normative judgments have a very special feature: they have an essential or ‘internalist’ connection to motivation and practical reasoning. Any adequate account of the meaning of normative statement and of the nature of normative judgments must somehow explain why this sort of internalism is true.