- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The McKinsey axiom is not compact
Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (4):1230-1238 (1992)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
An Investigation of the Properties of the Mckinsey Axiom.Xiaoping Wang - 1991 - Dissertation, Tulane University
The McKinsey axiom is not canonical.Robert Goldblatt - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (2):554-562.
The Mckinsey–Tarski Theorem for Locally Compact Ordered Spaces.Guram Bezhanishvili, Nick Bezhanishvili, Joel Lucero-Bryan & Jan van Mill - 2021 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 27 (2):187-211.
Canonicity for intensional logics with even axioms.Timothy J. Surendonk - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (3):1141-1156.
Wang Hao. Arithmetic translations of axiom systems. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 71 , pp. 283–293. [REVIEW]Richard Montague - 1956 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 21 (4):402-403.
Wang Hao. Different axiom systems. A survey of mathematical logic, Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics, Science Press, Peking, and North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1963, pp. 383–431. [REVIEW]Steven Orey - 1964 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 29 (4):208-208.
Wang Hao. Remarks on the comparison of axiom systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 36 , pp. 448–453. [REVIEW]Andrzej Mostowski - 1951 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 16 (2):142-143.
The axiom of Mckinsey-Sobociński k1 in the framework of discussive logics.Marek Nasieniewski - 2003 - Logique Et Analyse 46:315-324.
Products of Compact Spaces and the Axiom of Choice.Jean E. Rubin, Kyriakos Keremedis, Paul Howard, Eric Hall & Omar De la Cruz - 2002 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 48 (4):508-516.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
197 (#204,989)
6 months
47 (#176,555)
2009-01-28
Downloads
197 (#204,989)
6 months
47 (#176,555)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
A comparison of two approaches to parainconsistency: Flemish and Polish.Marek Nasieniewski - 2001 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 9:47.
On canonicity and strong completeness conditions in intermediate propositional logics.Silvio Ghilardi & Pierangelo Miglioli - 1999 - Studia Logica 63 (3):353-385.
Canonicity for intensional logics without iterative axioms.Timothy J. Surendonk - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (4):391-409.
Intentional identity revisited.Ahti Pietarinen - 2010 - Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (2):147-188.
Canonicity for intensional logics with even axioms.Timothy J. Surendonk - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (3):1141-1156.
References found in this work
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation