Robot minds and human ethics: the need for a comprehensive model of moral decision making [Book Review]

Ethics and Information Technology 12 (3):243-250 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Building artificial moral agents (AMAs) underscores the fragmentary character of presently available models of human ethical behavior. It is a distinctly different enterprise from either the attempt by moral philosophers to illuminate the “ought” of ethics or the research by cognitive scientists directed at revealing the mechanisms that influence moral psychology, and yet it draws on both. Philosophers and cognitive scientists have tended to stress the importance of particular cognitive mechanisms, e.g., reasoning, moral sentiments, heuristics, intuitions, or a moral grammar, in the making of moral decisions. However, assembling a system from the bottom-up which is capable of accommodating moral considerations draws attention to the importance of a much wider array of mechanisms in honing moral intelligence. Moral machines need not emulate human cognitive faculties in order to function satisfactorily in responding to morally significant situations. But working through methods for building AMAs will have a profound effect in deepening an appreciation for the many mechanisms that contribute to a moral acumen, and the manner in which these mechanisms work together. Building AMAs highlights the need for a comprehensive model of how humans arrive at satisfactory moral judgments

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Robot Morals and Human Ethics.Wendell Wallach - 2010 - Teaching Ethics 11 (1):87-92.
Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right From Wrong.Wendell Wallach & Colin Allen - 2008 - New York, US: Oxford University Press.
Moral Machines?Michael S. Pritchard - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):411-417.
A Cognitive–Intuitionist Model of Moral Judgment.Adenekan Dedeke - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 126 (3):437-457.
Philosophers, Engineers, and the Design of Amas.Wendell Wallach & Colin Allen - 2008 - In Wendell Wallach & Colin Allen, Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right From Wrong. New York, US: Oxford University Press. pp. 73-82.
Critiquing the Reasons for Making Artificial Moral Agents.Aimee Wynsberghe & Scott Robbins - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (3):719-735.
Moral sensitivity and the limits of artificial moral agents.Joris Graff - 2024 - Ethics and Information Technology 26 (1):1-12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-19

Downloads
261 (#160,007)

6 months
12 (#1,008,346)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Minds, brains, and programs.John Searle - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):417-57.
The Theory of Moral Sentiments.Adam Smith - 1759 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. Edited by Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya.
Animal Liberation.Peter Singer (ed.) - 1977 - Avon Books.
A Treatise of Human Nature (1739-40).David Hume & D. G. C. Macnabb - 1739 - Mineola, N.Y.: Oxford University Press. Edited by Ernest Campbell Mossner.

View all 35 references / Add more references