- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
When do genetic researchers have a duty to recontact study participants?
American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):26 – 27 (2006)
Abstract
This Article does not have an abstractOther Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Primary care physicians and the duty to inform about genetic discrimination.Anita Silvers - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (3):1 – 2.
Clinical utility and full disclosure of genetic results to research participants.Richard R. Sharp & Morris W. Foster - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):42 – 44.
Undesirable implications of disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.Leslie A. Meltzer - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):28 – 30.
Let's Rethink Roe v. Wade —And Overturn It.Jack Mulder - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (12):65-66.
Do Researchers Have an Obligation to Actively Look for Genetic Incidental Findings?Catherine Gliwa & Benjamin E. Berkman - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (2):32-42.
Review of Andrea Gillies, Keeper: Living With Nancy, A Journey Into Alzheimer's. [REVIEW]Emma Zimmerman - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (11):29-31.
Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.Vardit Ravitsky & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):8 – 17.
A Supportive Yet Critical Response to “Rethinking Roe v. Wade : Defending the Abortion Right in the Face of Contemporary Opposition”.Kurt Liebegott - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (12):61-63.
A Kantian duty to commit suicide and its implications for bioethics.Rosamond Rhodes - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (6):45 – 47.
Research participation: Are we subject to a duty?Robert Wachbroit & David Wasserman - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):48 – 49.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
103 (#490,971)
6 months
13 (#895,072)
2009-01-28
Downloads
103 (#490,971)
6 months
13 (#895,072)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations.Susan M. Wolf, Frances P. Lawrenz, Charles A. Nelson, Jeffrey P. Kahn, Mildred K. Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G. Fletcher, Michael K. Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson, Judy Illes, Vivek Kapur, Moira A. Keane, Barbara A. Koenig, Bonnie S. LeRoy, Elizabeth G. McFarland, Jordan Paradise, Lisa S. Parker, Sharon F. Terry, Brian Van Ness & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):219-248.
Qualitative thematic analysis of consent forms used in cancer genome sequencing.Clarissa Allen & William D. Foulkes - 2011 - BMC Medical Ethics 12 (1):14.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants”: Defining Clinical Utility And Revisiting the Role of Relationships.Vardit Ravitsky & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):W10-W12.
References found in this work
Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants.Vardit Ravitsky & Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):8 – 17.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation