Escaping from the Cave: A Reply to Dunn and Suter

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):79 - 87 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Those who disturb the hornets’ nest better be thick skinned. Keeping that in mind, thus far I kept my silence in the face of the adverse reactions my essay “On What One Knows” has provoked in the literature. As to the merits of the various objections, moreover, I trusted the judgement of the philosophical community to sort them out, and either recognize their futility, or make the necessary adjustments in my arguments without the need to reject the conclusions.In the case of Dunn and Suter, however, I decided to make an exception. The reason is that they indeed succeeded in pointing out certain difficulties in my position, which are not due to misunderstandings, conflicting linguistic intuitions, or other superficial sources. And, second, meeting their objections gives me the opportunity of proposing a significant refinement of my theory, the need for which I increasingly felt in the meanwhile myself.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
117 (#405,004)

6 months
14 (#829,537)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Knowledge entails dispositional belief.David Rose & Jonathan Schaffer - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (S1):19-50.
Knowing the Facts.Mark Textor - 2011 - Dialectica 65 (1):75-86.
An Intentional Fallacy in Epistemology.Alan R. White - 1981 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 11 (3):539 - 543.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references