Proof systems for Dynamic Predicate Logic

Abstract

The core language can be extended by defining additional logical constants. E.g., we can add ‘→’ (implication), ‘∨’ (disjunction), and ‘∀x’ (universal quantifiers). The choice of logical primitives is not as optional in DPL as it is in standard predicate logic

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Formalizing Potentiality.Barbara Vetter - 2015 - In Potentiality: From Dispositions to Modality. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 141-196.
The Theory of Form Logic.Wolfgang Freitag & Alexandra Zinke - 2012 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 21 (4):363-389.
The donkey and the monoid. Dynamic semantics with control elements.Albert Visser - 2002 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (1):107-131.
Contexts in dynamic predicate logic.Albert Visser - 1998 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 (1):21-52.
A System of Complete and Consistent Truth.Volker Halbach - 1994 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35 (1):311--27.
Dynamic relation logic is the logic of DPL-Relations.Albert Visser - 1997 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 6 (4):441-452.
Logic as an internal organisation of language.Boris Čulina - 2024 - Science and Philosophy 12 (1):62-71.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
136 (#324,110)

6 months
14 (#866,120)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frank Veltman
University of Amsterdam

Citations of this work

Exclusively indexical deduction.Paul Dekker - 2016 - Review of Symbolic Logic 9 (3):603-637.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references