- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Defaults in update semantics
Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (3):221 - 261 (1996)
Abstract
The aim of this paper is twofold: (i) to introduce the framework of update semantics and to explain what kind of semantic phenomena may successfully be analysed in it: (ii) to give a detailed analysis of one such phenomenon: default reasoningAuthor's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Uncertainty and Persistence: a Bayesian Update Semantics for Probabilistic Expressions.Deniz Rudin - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 47 (3):365-405.
Temporalizing epistemic default logic.Wiebe van der Hoek, John-Jules Meyer & Jan Treur - 1998 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 (3):341-367.
Deriving properties of belief update from theories of action.Alvaro Vadell & Yoav Shoham - 1994 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 3 (2).
Belief Reports: Defaults, Intentions and Scorekeeping.Giacomo Turbanti - 2010 - In Piotr Stalmaszczyk, Objects of Inquiry in Philosophy of Language and Linguistics. Ontos Verlag. pp. 363.
Deriving properties of belief update from theories of action.Alvaro Val & Yoav Shoham - 1994 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 3 (2):81-119.
Chisholm’s Paradox Revisited: Puzzles regarding Contrary-to-Duty Obligations and a Dynamic Solution.Yuna Won - 2021 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 7.
Dynamic Foundations for Deontic Logic.Malte Willer - 2016 - In Nate Charlow & Matthew Chrisman, Deontic Modality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 324-354.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
593 (#95,157)
6 months
60 (#151,980)
2009-01-28
Downloads
593 (#95,157)
6 months
60 (#151,980)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Modal Future: A Theory of Future-Directed Thought and Talk.Fabrizio Cariani - 2021 - Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Probability for Epistemic Modalities.Simon Goldstein & Paolo Santorio - 2021 - Philosophers' Imprint 21 (33).
References found in this work
Pragmatic Presuppositions.Robert Stalnaker - 1999 - In Context and Content: Essays on Intentionality in Speech and Thought. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 47--62.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation