Consciousness and the "causal paradox"

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (3):538-542 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Viewed from a first-person perspective consciousness appears to be necessary for complex, novel human activity - but viewed from a third-person perspective consciousness appears to play no role in the activity of brains, producing a "causal paradox". To resolve this paradox one needs to distinguish consciousness of processing from consciousness accompanying processing or causing processing. Accounts of consciousness/brain causal interactions switch between first- and third-person perspectives. However, epistemically, the differences between first- and third-person access are fundamental. First- and third-person accounts are complementary and mutually irreducible.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
167 (#246,698)

6 months
27 (#365,226)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Max Velmans
Goldsmiths College, University of London

Citations of this work

How could conscious experiences affect brains?Max Velmans - 2002 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 9 (11):3-29.
Reflexive monism.Max Velmans - 2008 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (2):5-50.
Intentionality, Conceptual Content, and Emotions.Léo Peruzzo Júnior - 2019 - Revista de Filosofia Aurora 31 (54).

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Facing up to the problem of consciousness.David Chalmers - 1995 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 2 (3):200-19.
Is human information processing conscious?Max Velmans - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):651-69.
Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems.David R. Shanks & Mark F. St John - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (3):367-447.
Evidence against epiphenomenalism.Ned Block - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):670-672.

View all 26 references / Add more references