- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Seeing “Lamarckian” More Positively: The Use/Disuse Paradigm Increases Understanding
Bioessays 41 (6):1900054 (2019)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
All’origine dell’eredità dei caratteri acquisiti: rileggere Erasmus Darwin e Jean-Baptiste de Lamarck per ricordarne la vera identità.Mauro Mandrioli - unknown
A use/disuse paradigm for CRISPR-Cas systems.Sophie Juliane Veigl - 2019 - Biology and Philosophy 34 (1):13.
Is cultural evolution Lamarckian?Maria E. Kronfeldner - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 22 (4):493-512.
Lamarckian realities: the CRISPR-Cas system and beyond.Eva Jablonka - 2019 - Biology and Philosophy 34 (1):14.
The Contributions – and Collapse – of Lamarckian Heredity in Pasteurian Molecular Biology: 1. Lysogeny, 1900–1960.Laurent Loison, Jean Gayon & Richard M. Burian - 2017 - Journal of the History of Biology 50 (1):5-52.
Lamarckism and epigenetic inheritance: a clarification.Laurent Loison - 2018 - Biology and Philosophy 33 (3):29.
Striving for clarity about the “Lamarckian” nature of CRISPR-Cas systems.Sam Woolley, Emily C. Parke, David Kelley, Anthony M. Poole & Austen R. D. Ganley - 2019 - Biology and Philosophy 34 (1):11.
Mutationism, not Lamarckism, captures the novelty of CRISPR–Cas.Jeremy G. Wideman, S. Andrew Inkpen, W. Ford Doolittle & Rosemary J. Redfield - 2019 - Biology and Philosophy 34 (1):12.
Structures of heredity. Review of Eva Jablonka and Marion Lamb, epigenetic inheritance and evolution, the Lamarckian dimension.Evelyn Fox Keller - 1998 - Biology and Philosophy 13 (1):113-118.
Big Dreams for Small Creatures: Ilana and Eugene Rosenberg’s path to the Hologenome Theory.Ehud Lamm - 2018 - In Oren Harman & Michael R. Dietrich, Dreamers, Visionaries, and Revolutionaries in the Life Sciences. University of Chicago Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-05-22
Downloads
47 (#1,235,958)
6 months
2 (#1,999,237)
2019-05-22
Downloads
47 (#1,235,958)
6 months
2 (#1,999,237)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Scientific Pluralism in Practice: Responses to Anomaly in the Sciences.Sophie Juliane Veigl - 2022 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 14 (14).
Do heritable immune responses extend physiological individuality?Sophie Juliane Veigl - 2022 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 44 (4):1-20.
We Should Not Use the Term “Lamarckian” as It Is Often Used in Opposition to “Darwinian”.Dave Speijer - 2019 - Bioessays 41 (9):1900092.
References found in this work
A use/disuse paradigm for CRISPR-Cas systems.Sophie Juliane Veigl - 2019 - Biology and Philosophy 34 (1):13.
Systemic functional adaptedness and domain-general cognition: broadening the scope of evolutionary psychology.Michael Lundie - 2019 - Biology and Philosophy 34 (1):8.
The Diversity of Scientific Projects.Angela Potochnik - 2017 - In Idealization and the Aims of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 62-89.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation