Are Virtual Quanta Nothing but Formal Tools?

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):39 - 53 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The received view in philosophical studies of quantum field theory is that Feynman diagrams are simply calculational devices. Alongside this view we have the one that takes virtual quanta to be also simply formal tools. This received view was developed and consolidated in philosophy of physics by Mario Bunge, Paul Teller, Michael Redhead, Robert Weingard, Brigitte Falkenburg, and others. In this article I present an alternative to the received view

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-03-24

Downloads
202 (#199,796)

6 months
50 (#168,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mario Bacelar Valente
Universidad de Sevilla (PhD)

Citations of this work

Metaphysics of the principle of least action.Vladislav Terekhovich - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 62:189-201.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

An Interpretative Introduction to Quantum Field Theory.Paul Teller - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (1):152-153.
[no title].Harvey R. Brown & Rom Harré (eds.) - 1988 - New York: Oxford University Press.
QED and the Men Who Made It: Dyson, Feynman, Schwinger, and Tomonaga.Silvan S. Schweber - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (4):624-627.

View all 14 references / Add more references