Induction from a Single Instance: Incomplete Frames [Book Review]

Foundations of Science 18 (4):641-653 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we argue that an existing theory of concepts called dynamic frame theory, although not developed with that purpose in mind, allows for the precise formulation of a number of problems associated with induction from a single instance. A key role is played by the distinction we introduce between complete and incomplete dynamic frames, for incomplete frames seem to be very elegant candidates for the format of the background knowledge used in induction from a single instance. Furthermore, we show how dynamic frame theory provides the terminology to discuss the justification and the fallibility of incomplete frames. In the Appendix, we give a formal account of incomplete frames and the way these lead to induction from a single instance

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-17

Downloads
120 (#390,187)

6 months
20 (#528,913)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Rafal Urbaniak
University of Gdansk
Frederik Van De Putte
Erasmus University Rotterdam

Citations of this work

Generic reasoning: A programmatic sketch.Federico L. G. Faroldi - 2026 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 34 (2).

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two Dogmas of Empiricism.W. Quine - 1951 - [Longmans, Green].
Fact, Fiction, and Forecast.Nelson Goodman - 1983 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive.John Stuart Mill - 1843 - New York and London,: University of Toronto Press. Edited by J. Robson.
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.W. V. O. Quine - 2011 - In Robert B. Talisse & Scott F. Aikin, The Pragmatism Reader: From Peirce through the Present. Princeton: Princeton University Press. pp. 202-220.

View all 33 references / Add more references