Ehrenfest and Ehrenfest-Afanassjewa on why Boltzmannian and Gibbsian calculations agree

Abstract

The relation between the Boltzmannian and the Gibbsian formulations of statistical mechanics is one of the major conceptual issues in the foundations of the discipline. In their celebrated review of statistical mechanics, Paul Ehrenfest and Tatiana Ehrenfest-Afanassjewa discuss this issue and offer an argument for the conclusion that Boltzmannian equilibrium values agree with Gibbsian phase averages. In this paper, we analyse their argument, which is still important today, and point out that its scope is limited to dilute gases.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2026-01-28

Downloads
19 (#1,855,715)

6 months
19 (#600,705)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Jos Uffink
University of Minnesota
Charlotte Werndl
University of Salzburg
1 more

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Probabilities in Statistical Mechanics.Wayne C. Myrvold - 2016 - In Alan Hájek & Christopher Hitchcock, The Oxford Handbook of Probability and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 573-600.
Rethinking boltzmannian equilibrium.Charlotte Werndl & Roman Frigg - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (5):1224-1235.
Boltzmann, Gibbs, and the concept of equilibrium.David A. Lavis - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (5):682-696.

View all 9 references / Add more references