Are Interactive Exhibits at a Science Center Cognitive Artifacts?

Foundations of Science 30 (3):651-675 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper examines the semiotic and cognitive status of interactive exhibits at science centers, taking the Copernicus Science Center in Warsaw (CSC) as an example. Such science centers support bottom-up interactions, encouraging visitors to spontaneously explore the exhibits in various ways. We analyze one distinctive way of interaction, when young visitors ignore an exhibit’s instruction and use it as if it were a kind of a toy or machine to play with (this is particularly common with exhibits that are unfamiliar “open-ended objects”). Drawing on cognitive semiotics we describe this particular way of interacting with exhibits as the reality mode of experience, in which the user ignores an intended exhibit’s representational function. We consider whether such interactive objects can be framed as cognitive artifacts, given that standard conceptualizations of artifacts emphasize their representational function. How can we convincingly describe the process by which the cognitive function of an exhibit experienced in reality mode is constituted? In this paper we apply concept of ecological cognitive artifact and the idea of the enactive signification to these questions. We argue that exhibits experienced in reality mode do indeed perform cognitive functions, even in the absence of a representational relation. Our investigation provides insights into the cognitive functions of exhibits and contributes to the conceptualization of non-representational cognitive artifacts.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cognitive Artifacts and Their Virtues in Scientific Practice.Marcin Miłkowski - 2022 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 67 (1):219-246.
A taxonomy of cognitive artifacts: Function, information, and categories.Richard Heersmink - 2013 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (3):465-481.
Cognitive Artifacts for Geometric Reasoning.Mateusz Hohol & Marcin Miłkowski - 2019 - Foundations of Science 24 (4):657-680.
Representation: Problems and Solutions.Nancy Salay - 2015 - In D. C. Noelle, R. Dale, Anne Warlaumont, Jeffrey Yoshimi, T. Matlock, C. D. Jennings & P. P. Maglio, Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society.
Model Types and Explanatory Styles in Cognitive Theories.Marco Giunti & Simone Pinna - 2019 - In Matthieu Fontaine, Cristina Barés-Gómez, Francisco Salguero-Lamillar, Lorenzo Magnani & Ángel Nepomuceno-Fernández, Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology: Inferential Models for Logic, Language, Cognition and Computation. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 20-40.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-08-03

Downloads
57 (#1,054,348)

6 months
26 (#366,767)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marcin Trybulec
Maria Curie-Sklodowska University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Genetic epistemology.Jean Piaget - 1970 - New York,: Columbia University Press.
Six Views of Embodied Cognition.Margaret Wilson - 2002 - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9 (4):625--636.
Is justified true belief knowledge?Edmund L. Gettier - 2000 - In Steven M. Cahn, Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 121--3.
An outline of a theory of affordances.Anthony Chemero - 2003 - Ecological Psychology 15 (2):181-195.

View all 27 references / Add more references