A world without violet: peculiar consequences of granting moral status to Artificial Intelligences

AI and Society:1-15 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Granting artificial intelligences (AIs) moral status creates a set of ethical dilemmas stemming from our ability to control their preferences. As an illustrative example, if we could program an artificial system worthy of moral agency to experience suffering when encountering the color violet, then we appear to have created a scenario where we have a moral imperative to remove any violet objects from our surroundings. AIs in this situation can effectively “hijack” our moral landscape, altering the moral valence of arbitrary world states. In this work, we formalize the phenomenon of moral hijacking, analyze its implications from the perspective of several ethical systems, and propose recommendations for constraining novel preference creation in moral agents.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2026-01-19

Downloads
26 (#1,693,303)

6 months
21 (#496,988)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Facing up to the problem of consciousness.David Chalmers - 1995 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 2 (3):200-19.
What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon (ed.) - 1998 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford Paperbacks.
Minds, brains, and programs.John Searle - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):417-57.

View all 45 references / Add more references