Recent Work in Standpoint Epistemology

Analysis 81 (2):338-350 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Within the last decade, burgeoning interest in the intersection of epistemology and social issues has generated a new set of research questions. These questions range from the relevance of social identity, to peer disagreement, to debates on the significance of moral considerations to epistemic evaluations, to discussions of our epistemic practices and how those practices exclude certain agents and certain bodies of knowledge. Central in this new and emerging body of work is the realization that epistemology has more to do than simply answer questions about what knowledge consists in; it must also acknowledge that our answers to these questions might be influenced by features we have previously failed to make space for. It is in this respect that we are witnessing a renewed interest in a theoretical approach long consigned to the margins of epistemology – that of standpoint epistemology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-08-09

Downloads
781 (#74,449)

6 months
78 (#136,523)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Briana Toole
Claremont McKenna College

Citations of this work

Standpoint Epistemology and Epistemic Peerhood: A Defense of Epistemic Privilege.Briana Toole - 2024 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 10 (3):409-426.
Social Identity, Understanding, and Deference.Michael Hannon - forthcoming - Philosophical Studies:1-30.
Epistemic relations and epistemic reparations.Cameron Boult - 2026 - Philosophical Studies:793-814.
The Value of Disagreement in AI Design, Evaluation, and Alignment.Sina Fazelpour & Will Fleisher - 2025 - The 2025 Acm Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Facct ’25):2138-2150.

View all 41 citations / Add more citations