Base-extension semantics for S5 modal logic

Logic Journal of the IGPL 33 (3) (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In proof-theoretic semantics, meaning is based on inference. It may be seen as the mathematical expression of the inferentialist interpretation of logic. Much recent work has focused on base-extension semantics, in which the validity of formulas is given by an inductive definition generated by provability in a ‘base’ of atomic rules. Base-extension semantics for classical and intuitionistic propositional logic have been explored by several authors. In this paper, we develop base-extension semantics for the classical propositional modal systems K, KT , K4, and S4, with □ as the primary modal operator. We establish appropriate soundness and completeness theorems and establish the duality between □ and a natural presentation of ♢. We also show that our semantics is in its current form not complete with respect to euclidean modal logics. Our formulation makes essential use of relational structures on bases.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-01-24

Downloads
1,535 (#26,462)

6 months
351 (#17,976)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Timo Eckhardt
University College London
David Pym
School of Advanced Study, University of London

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The logical basis of metaphysics.Michael Dummett - 1991 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Natural deduction: a proof-theoretical study.Dag Prawitz - 1965 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications.
Modal logic.Patrick Blackburn - 2001 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Maarten de Rijke & Yde Venema.
A completeness theorem in modal logic.Saul Kripke - 1959 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 24 (1):1-14.

View all 22 references / Add more references