Rationing and life-saving treatments: should identifiable patients have higher priority?

Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (3):179-185 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Health care systems across the world are unable to afford the best treatment for all patients in all situations. Choices have to be made. One key ethical issue that arises for health authorities is whether the principle of the “rule of rescue” should be adopted or rejected. According to this principle more funding should be available in order to save lives of identifiable, compared with unidentifiable, individuals. Six reasons for giving such priority to identifiable individuals are considered. All are rejected. It is concluded that the principle of the rule of rescue should not be used in determining the allocation of health resources

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Should Every Human Being Get Health Care?Göran Collste - 1999 - Ethical Perspectives 6 (2):115-125.
Just Genetics.Rosamond Rhodes, Margaret Battin & Anita Silvers - 2012 - In Rosamond Rhodes, Margaret Battin & Anita Silvers, Medicine and Social Justice: Essays on the Distribution of Health Care. New York, US: OUP Usa. pp. 461-474.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
210 (#191,996)

6 months
73 (#139,754)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The normative significance of identifiability.Tomasz Żuradzki - 2019 - Ethics and Information Technology 21 (4):295-305.
The Expressive Function of Healthcare.Johann Go - 2023 - The Journal of Ethics 27 (3):329-353.
The Problem with Rescue Medicine.N. S. Jecker - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (1):64-81.

View all 23 citations / Add more citations