- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Defining the Cause of Death and Vitality of Organs in the Ethical Analysis of Controlled Donation after Circulatory Death Procedures
American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):35-38 (2023)
Abstract
In their manuscript, Nielsen Busch and Mjaaland (2023) argue that controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) is compatible with the dead donor rule (DDR) by describing the DDR and the incor...Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Dead Donor Rule Does Require that the Donor is Dead.Lainie Ross - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):12-14.
Cerebral Circulatory Arrest and the Dead Donor Rule.Christos Lazaridis - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):43-45.
Protecting Life and Ensuring Death—Confounding the Dead Donor Rule.Adam Omelianchuk - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):20-22.
Almagest Again? An Epistemological Critique of Nielsen Busch and Mjaaland.David Kaufman, Michael J. Nabozny & Margie Hodges Shaw - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):33-35.
The Dead Donor Rule Is Not Morally Sufficient.Stephen Napier - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):57-59.
Does Controlled Donation after Circulatory Death Violate the Dead Donor Rule?Emil J. Nielsen Busch & Marius T. Mjaaland - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):4-11.
Donors and Organs at the Borders of Vitality and Public Trust: Why DCD Donors Must Be Dead and Not Dying.John P. Lizza & Aasim Padela - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):53-55.
Not Dead, but Close Enough? You Cannot Have Your Cake and Eat It Too in Satisfying the DDR in cDCD.Brendan Parent & Tamar Schiff - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):22-24.
Normothermic Regional Perfusion, Causes, and the Dead Donor Rule.Andrew M. Courtwright - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):46-47.
Changing the Focus in the Donation After Circulatory Death Debates.Miriam Piven Cotler, Michael Nurok, Pedro A. Catarino, Rosemary O’Meeghan & Jason N. Batten - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):48-49.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-01-23
Downloads
77 (#749,961)
6 months
18 (#643,420)
2023-01-23
Downloads
77 (#749,961)
6 months
18 (#643,420)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
What is Death and Why Do We Insist on the Dead Donor Rule? A Response to Our Critics.Emil J. Busch & Marius T. Mjaaland - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (4):8-12.
References found in this work
Does Controlled Donation after Circulatory Death Violate the Dead Donor Rule?Emil J. Nielsen Busch & Marius T. Mjaaland - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):4-11.
May I give my heart away? On the permissibility of living vital organ donation.Didde B. Andersen - 2021 - Bioethics 35 (8):812-819.
Ethical Considerations in Supporting Donation after Circulatory Death: The Role of the Dead-Donor Rule.Robert Fine & Giuliano Testa - 2022 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 33 (3):220-224.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation