James Moor’s Privacy Framework: A Theory in Need of Further Exploration

Minds and Machines 35 (2):1-7 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is intended as a tribute to the late James Moor. An esteemed Dartmouth professor, who published in many areas of philosophy, including logic, Moor is perhaps best remembered today for his pioneering work in the field of computer ethics. His seminal (and award-winning) article, “What Is Computer Ethics?” (_Metaphilosophy_, 1985) was highly influential both in defining and shaping the then nascent field of computer ethics. Many other computer-ethics-related papers followed over the next quarter century, in which Moor examined a range of topics – from moral responsibility to autonomy to privacy in the context of computing and emerging technologies, including nanotechnology and AI. And while the insights and frameworks put forth in many of his published works have received the acclaim they deserve, Moor’s contribution to the privacy literature remains, in my view, underappreciated. In trying to show why his privacy theory deserves much more attention than received to date, I also briefly describe the evolution of Moor’s position on privacy – from his earlier publications on that topic to a comprehensive and systematic privacy framework. I then suggest that a further exploration of his privacy theory would benefit researchers working in technology ethics in general, and AI ethics in particular. Finally, I encourage privacy scholars to take a closer look at Moor’s privacy framework to see whether they might be able to tease out and disclose some potential insights and features that may still be embedded in that robust theory of privacy.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The importance of privacy revisited.Norman Mooradian - 2009 - Ethics and Information Technology 11 (3):163-174.
KDD, data mining, and the challenge for normative privacy.Herman T. Tavani - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (4):265-273.
Lilliputian Computer Ethics.John Weckert - 2002 - Metaphilosophy 33 (3):366-375.
Privacy preserving or trapping?Xiao-yu Sun & Bin Ye - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-11.
Moor’s theory of just consequentialism.Richard A. Spinello - 2025 - Minds and Machines 35 (2):1-9.
Computing and technology ethics: engaging through science fiction.Emanuelle Burton - 2023 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. Edited by Judith Goldsmith, Nicholas Mattei, Cory Siler & Sara-Jo Swiatek.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-03-29

Downloads
76 (#762,894)

6 months
32 (#284,326)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Towards a theory of privacy in the information age.James H. Moor - 1997 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 27 (3):27-32.
Just consequentialism and computing.James H. Moor - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):61-65.

Add more references