Explaining monoculturalism: Beyond Gellner's theory of nationalism

Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 10 (2):251-270 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For Ernest Gellner, nationalism occurs in the modern period because industrial societies, unlike agrarian ones, need homogeneous languages and cultures in order to work efficiently. Thus, states and intellectuals mobilize campaigns of assimilation through public education and the culture industries. Gellner's theory, however, fails to explain all forms of nationalism, is overly materialist, and at times relies on dubious functionalist explanations. A more satisfactory theory would take into account the cultural content of nationalism—not only myths, but political culture—as well as phenomena of identity and collective action.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nation‐states and states of mind: Nationalism as psychology.Martin Tyrrell - 1996 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 10 (2):233-250.
Nationalism, individualism, and capitalism: Reply to Greenfeld.Warren Breckman & Lars Trägårdh - 1996 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 10 (3):389-407.
Ernest Gellner and contemporary social thought.Siniša Malešević & Mark Haugaard (eds.) - 2007 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Toward a liberal socialist cosmopolitan nationalism.Kai Nielsen - 2003 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (4):437 – 463.
Three Kinds of Nationalism.Andrew Oldenquist - 2001 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):63-72.
On the Demos and its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem.Arash Abizadeh - 2012 - American Political Science Review 106 (4):867-882.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-18

Downloads
125 (#367,069)

6 months
20 (#535,584)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?