In Defence of Aristotelian Metaphysics

In Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 26-43 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When I say that my conception of metaphysics is Aristotelian, or neo-Aristotelian, this may have more to do with Aristotle’s philosophical methodology than his metaphysics, but, as I see it, the core of this Aristotelian conception of metaphysics is the idea that metaphysics is the first philosophy . In what follows I will attempt to clarify what this conception of metaphysics amounts to in the context of some recent discussion on the methodology of metaphysics (e.g. Chalmers et al . (2009), Ladyman and Ross (2007)). There is a lot of hostility towards the Aristotelian conception of metaphysics in this literature: for instance, the majority of the contributors to the Metametaphysics volume assume a rather more deflationary, Quinean approach towards metaphysics. In the process of replying to the criticisms towards Aristotelian metaphysics put forward in recent literature I will also identify some methodological points which deserve more attention and ought to be addressed in future research

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

The Necessity of Metaphysics.Tuomas E. Tahko - 2008 - Dissertation, Durham University
Essential Predication in Aristotle’s Categories: A Defence.Christof Rapp - 2024 - In David Bronstein, Thomas Kjeller Johansen & Michail Peramatzis, Aristotelian Metaphysics. Essays in Honour of David Charles. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 143-167.
Neo-Aristotelian Metaphysics (Cambridge Elements in Metaphysics).Phil Corkum - 2025 - Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
On what grounds what.Jonathan Schaffer - 2009 - In David Chalmers, David Manley & Ryan Wasserman, Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 347-383.
IX—How Is Metaphysics Possible?Nicholas F. Stang - 2023 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 123 (3):231-252.
The question of metaphysics.Jessica Wilson - 2016 - The Philosophers' Magazine 1:90-96.
Editorial- Aristotelian Metaphysics: Essence and Ground.Riin Sirkel & Tuomas E. Tahko (eds.) - 2014 - Studia Philosophica Estonica, Vol 7.2.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-08-27

Downloads
2,056 (#14,641)

6 months
168 (#76,548)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tuomas E. Tahko
University of Bristol

Citations of this work

The Coarse-Grainedness of Grounding.Kathrin Koslicki - 2015 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 9:306-344.
Questions of Ontology.Kathrin Koslicki - 2016 - In Stephan Blatti & Sandra Lapointe, Ontology after Carnap. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press UK.

View all 22 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Every thing must go: metaphysics naturalized.James Ladyman & Don Ross - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Don Ross, David Spurrett & John G. Collier.
On what grounds what.Jonathan Schaffer - 2009 - In David Chalmers, David Manley & Ryan Wasserman, Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 347-383.
Essence and modality.Kit Fine - 1994 - Philosophical Perspectives 8 (Logic and Language):1-16.
Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized.James Ladyman & Don Ross - 2007 - In James Ladyman & Don Ross, Every thing must go: metaphysics naturalized. New York: Oxford University Press.
Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity, and Time.E. J. Lowe - 2001 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.

View all 14 references / Add more references