Second reply to grünbaum

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):919-925 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I give a detailed defence against Grunbaum’s 2004 attack on my Bayesian argument for the existence of God from various features of the universe (its conformity to simple laws, the laws being such as to lead to the evolution of humans, etc.). Theism postulates the simplest possible stopping point for explanation of the various features which I mention, and is such that it makes the accounts of those features more probable than they would be otherwise

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/axi144

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Rejoinder to Richard Swinburne's 'Second Reply to Grunbaum'.Adolf Grünbaum - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):927-938.
Arguments for the Existence of God IN Key Themes in Philosophy.R. G. Swinburne - 1989 - In [no title]. Cambridge University Press.
Arguments for the existence of God.R. G. Swinburne - 1984 - In J. Houston, Is it reasonable to believe in God? Edinburgh: Handsel Press. pp. 121 - 133.
Is Theism a Simple, and hence Probable, Explanation for the Universe?John Ostrowick - 2012 - South African Journal of Philosophy 31 (2):354-368.
Discussion. Reply to grünbaum.Richard Swinburne - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (3):481-485.
Inductive Arguments.Richard Swinburne - 1991 - In The existence of God. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 5-21.
Arguments from Order to Design.Herman Philipse - 2012 - In God in the Age of Science?: A Critique of Religious Reason. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 256-278.
Prior Probabilities in the Argument From Fine-Tuning.Richard Swinburne - 2005 - Faith and Philosophy 22 (5):641-653.
Against Indifference Objections to the Fine-Tuning Argument.Thomas N. Metcalf - 2022 - Southwest Philosophy Review 38 (1):199-208.
How the Existence of God Explains the World and its Order.Richard Swinburne - 1996 - In Is there a God? New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 48-68.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
231 (#176,095)

6 months
27 (#365,226)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

A Reformed Natural Theology?Sebastian Rehnman - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4 (1):151-175.
Mind-Independent Values Don’t Exist, But Moral Truth Does.Maarten Van Doorn - 2017 - Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism ; Vol 25, No 1 25 (1):5-24.
Science, Worldviews, and Education.Hugh G. Gauch - 2009 - Science & Education 18 (6-7):667-695.
Rejoinder to Richard Swinburne's 'Second Reply to Grunbaum'.Adolf Grünbaum - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):927-938.
Mind-Independent Values Don’t Exist, But Moral Truth Does.Maarten Van Doorn - 2017 - Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism 25 (1):5-24.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Existence of God.Richard Swinburne - 2004 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
[no title].R. G. Swinburne - 1989 - Cambridge University Press.
Is there a God?Richard Swinburne - 1996 - New York: Oxford University Press.
A new critique of theological interpretations of physical cosmology.A. Grünbaum - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (1):1-43.
The Poverty of Theistic Cosmology.Adolf Grünbaum - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (4):561-614.

View all 7 references / Add more references