Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: A response to P.w. Anderson

Abstract

We discuss why, contrary to claims recently made by P.W. Anderson, decoherence has not solved the quantum measurement problem.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: a response to P.W. Anderson.Stephen L. Adler - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (1):135-142.
Why Decoherence has not Solved the Measurement Problem: A Response to P. W. Anderson.S. L. Adler - 2003 - Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34:135-142.
Decoherence and its Role in the Modern Measurement Problem.David Wallace - unknown
A history of entanglement: Decoherence and the interpretation problem.Kristian Camilleri - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (4):290-302.
Insolubility of the quantum measurement problem for unsharp observables.Paul Busch & Abner Shimony - 1996 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27 (4):397-404.
Relational Physics with Real Rods and Clocks and the Measurement Problem of Quantum Mechanics.Rodolfo Gambini & Jorge Pullin - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (7):1074-1092.
Assessing the Montevideo interpretation of quantum mechanics.Jeremy Butterfield - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 52 (Part A):75-85.
Review Articles-Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory.Matthew J. Donald - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 30 (3):437-442.
An axiomatic formulation of the Montevideo interpretation of quantum mechanics.Rodolfo Gambini, Luis Pedro García-Pintos & Jorge Pullin - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 42 (4):256-263.
Measurement outcomes and probability in Everettian quantum mechanics.David Baker - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (1):153-169.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
20 (#1,832,672)

6 months
20 (#564,349)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references