Why Military Conditioning Violates the Human Dignity of Soldiers

Moral Philosophy and Politics 11 (2):443-463 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article argues that military conditioning (MC) systematically violates the human dignity of soldiers. The argument relies on an absolute deontologist account of human dignity understood as a claim-right to live in self-respect, which is a right to decide on one’s own behalf about, and to be in control of, essential aspects of one’s own life. The article claims that MC violates soldiers’ dignity so understood because the largely automatic physical killing reflex that MC instills aims to remove their freedom of choice to kill or not to kill, while the MC practices that rationalize the killing of opponents aim to subvert soldiers’ moral deliberation in relation to this behavior. MC thus aims to take away soldiers’ control over a very essential aspect of human life: the decision whether to take life in war. Thereby, MC systematically violates their human dignity. The article concludes with a proposal for an amendment to international law that would allow legal institutions to do more justice to soldiers’ dignity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Death with Dignity.Christopher Kaczor & Robert P. George - 2017 - In Sebastian Muders, Human Dignity and Assisted Death. New York, NY: Oup Usa. pp. 68-82.
Dignity, Development, and the Gravity of Child Soldiering.Renée Nicole Souris - 2020 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 106 (3):465-475.
Risky Killing and the Ethics of War.Seth Lazar - 2015 - Ethics 126 (1):91-117.
Human Dignity as a Form of Life: Notes on Its Foundations and Meaning in Institutional Morality.Saulo Monteiro Martinho de Matos - 2020 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 33 (1):47-63.
Moral autonomy in Australian legislation and military doctrine.Richard Adams - 2013 - Ethics and Global Politics 6 (3):135-154.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-01-09

Downloads
150 (#283,256)

6 months
29 (#325,844)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Regina Sibylle Surber
University of Zürich

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice.John Rawls - 1971 - Oxford,: Harvard University Press. Edited by Steven M. Cahn.
A Theory of Justice: Original Edition.John Rawls - 1971 - Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press.
The second-person standpoint.Stephen Darwall - 2006 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals.Immanuel Kant - 1998 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Mary J. Gregor.

View all 53 references / Add more references