The paradox of self-amendment in American constitutional law

(2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Logical paradoxes in the strict sense produce statements like those of the Liar ("This very statement is false") that are false if true, and true if false. They resist rational solution or at least divide logicians for centuries of apparently irreconcilable wrangling. What happens when similar paradoxes arise in law?

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Self-Reference in Law.Peter Suber - unknown
Denying The Liar.Dale Jacquette - 2007 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):91-98.
Dialetheism and the Graphic Liar.Greg Littmann - 2012 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42 (1):15-27.
The No-No Paradox Is a Paradox.Roy T. Cook - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):467-482.
Symmetry and Paradox.Stephen Read - 2006 - History and Philosophy of Logic 27 (4):307-318.
Truthmaker Gaps and the No-No Paradox.Patrick Greenough - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (3):547 - 563.
The liar paradox, expressibility, possible languages.Matti Eklund - 2011 - In Jc Beall, Spandrels of Truth. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Congressional power to change constitutional law: Three lacunae.Richard A. Paschal - manuscript

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
74 (#790,846)

6 months
23 (#436,577)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Photo of Peter Suber
Peter Suber
Harvard University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references