Permissible Partiality, Projects, and Plural Agency

In Brian Feltham & John Cottingham, Partiality and impartiality: morality, special relationships, and the wider world. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 131-149 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter considers whether our moral entitlement to manifest certain kinds of partiality stems from a morally basic permission to be partial, or whether it can be accounted for in some other way. In particular, it explores the possibility of justifying partial conduct via a general moral prerogative to pursue our own projects. On this approach, in contexts of plural agency, where two or more people together pursue a joint project, we would have permission to favour our co-agents — but only in ways that relate to our joint project. While this approach might limit the scope of morally permissible partiality, it seems more faithful to the concerns that animate the partiality debates than the alternative of claiming an unrestricted basic right to be partial to whomsoever we wish.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The justification of national partiality.Thomas Hurka - 1997 - In Robert McKim, The Morality of Nationalism. New York, US: OUP Usa. pp. 139-57.
Friendship without partiality?Troy Jollimore - 2000 - Ratio 13 (1):69–82.
Partiality and Weighing Harm to Non-Combatants.David Lefkowitz - 2009 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (3):298-316.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-03

Downloads
33 (#1,530,636)

6 months
21 (#500,262)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sarah Stroud
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references