- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Replies
In Dominic Murphy & Michael Bishop, Stich and His Critics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 190–252 (2009)
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Reply to Devitt and Jackson Reply to Egan Reply to Cowie Reply to Goldman Reply to Sterelny Reply to Prinz Reply to Godfrey‐Smith Reply to Sosa Reply to Bishop References.Author's Profile
reply to Devitt and Jackson Jackson endorsing ‐ on how eliminativism debate becomes “embroiled” in theory of reference reply to Egan – Egan and paper “Is there a role for representational content in scientific psychology?” reply to Cowie ‐ Quine reminding us in “the immortal words of Adolf Meyer, where it doesn't itch don't scratch” reply to Goldman ‐ Shaun Nichols and author argueing over ‘simulation’ used in literature on mindreading Prinz's engaging and fact‐filled chapter ‐ focusing on moral nativism Bishop's rich and challenging paper ‐ detailed, largely sympathetic and exceptionally well‐informed overview of work in epistemology searching in the wrong place in the wrong way pragmatism vs. strategic reliabilism
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Replies.Noam Chomsky - 2008 - In Louise M. Antony & Norbert Hornstein, Chomsky and His Critics. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 255–328.
Reaffirming the poverty of the stimulus argument: A reply to the replies.Joel W. Lidz & S. Waxman - 2004 - Cognition 93 (2):157-165.
Replies to Commentators.Keith DeRose - 2019 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 9 (3):284-320.
Replies to my critics.Hilary Kornblith - 2025 - In Luis R. G. Oliveira & Joshua DiPaolo, Kornblith and His Critics. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 275-296.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
48 (#1,216,391)
6 months
10 (#1,169,684)
2009-01-28
Downloads
48 (#1,216,391)
6 months
10 (#1,169,684)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Gettier Across Cultures.Edouard Machery, Stephen Stich, David Rose, Amita Chatterjee, Kaori Karasawa, Noel Struchiner, Smita Sirker, Naoki Usui & Takaaki Hashimoto - 2015 - Noûs:645-664.
Animal morality: What is the debate about?Simon Fitzpatrick - 2017 - Biology and Philosophy 32 (6):1151-1183.
Who needs intuitions? Two Experimentalist Critiques.Jonathan Ichikawa - 2014 - In Anthony Robert Booth & Darrell P. Rowbottom, Intuitions. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 232-256.
Experimental Explication.Jonah N. Schupbach - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (3):672-710.
The Reference of Proper Names: Testing Usage and Intuitions.Michael Devitt & Nicolas Porot - 2018 - Cognitive Science 42 (5):1552-1585.
References found in this work
Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism.Ruth Garrett Millikan - 1984 - MIT Press.
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.) - 1982 - Cambridge University Press.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation