The Goodman paradox

Abstract

Summary With the help of psychological and biological concepts it is possible todescribe adequately a fundamental class of inductive inferences that are intuitively correct. Moreover, by relying on evolutionary theories it is possible tojustify them, because they reflect innate, hence useful, capacities. These inferences, however, refer to the past, i.e. the inferred generalization is of the form All Awere B . The reason is that evolutionary theories only claim that innate capacitieshad survival value. With respect to inductive inferences about the future the situation is different. In particular, they are affected by the Goodman paradox. In the article, a method is proposed which enables us to describe adequately a basic class of inductive inferences about the future which are intuitively correct. These inferences can also be justified, but their justification requires a very specific assumption. The conclusions arrived at in the article can be viewed as a satisfactory solution to the Goodman paradox

Other Versions

reprint Stemmer, Nathan (1975) "The goodman paradox". Zeitschrift Für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 6(2):340-354

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Goodman Paradox: Three Different Problems and a Naturalistic Solution to Two of Them.Nathan Stemmer - 2004 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 35 (2):351-370.
Rescher on the Goodman paradox.B. L. Bunch - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (1):119-123.
Feyerabend's solution to the Goodman paradox.Lawrence Foster - 1969 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20 (3):259-260.
A partial solution to the Goodman paradox.Nathan Stemmer - 1978 - Philosophical Studies 34 (2):177 - 185.
Probabilistic Confirmation Theory and the Goodman Paradox.R. D. Rosenkrantz - 1973 - American Philosophical Quarterly 10 (2):157 - 162.
Kreisel’s Theory of Constructions, the Kreisel-Goodman Paradox, and the Second Clause.Walter Dean & Hidenori Kurokawa - 2015 - In Peter Schroeder-Heister & Thomas Piecha, Advances in Proof-Theoretic Semantics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag. pp. 27-63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
76 (#762,842)

6 months
9 (#1,255,287)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Projectible predicates.Nathan Stemmer - 1979 - Synthese 41 (3):375 - 395.
The Goodman Paradox: Three Different Problems and a Naturalistic Solution to Two of Them.Nathan Stemmer - 2004 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 35 (2):351-370.
The reliability of inductive inferences and our innate capacities.Nathan Stemmer - 1978 - Zeitschrift Für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 9 (1):93-105.
Solving Goodman's paradox: A reply to Stemmer. [REVIEW]Kenneth Konyndyk - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 37 (3):297 - 305.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Fact, Fiction, and Forecast.Nelson Goodman - 1983 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Problems and projects.Nelson Goodman (ed.) - 1972 - Indianapolis,: Bobbs-Merrill.
Seven Strictures on Similarity.Nelson Goodman - 1972 - In Problems and projects. Indianapolis,: Bobbs-Merrill.
Natural Kinds.W. V. O. Quine - 1970 - In Carl G. Hempel, Donald Davidson & Nicholas Rescher, Essays in honor of Carl G. Hempel. Dordrecht,: D. Reidel. pp. 5.

View all 8 references / Add more references