On relativity theory and openness of the future

Philosophy of Science 58 (2):147-167 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It has been repeatedly argued, most recently by Nicholas Maxwell, that the special theory of relativity is incompatible with the view that the future is in some degree undetermined; and Maxwell contends that this is a reason to reject that theory. In the present paper, an analysis is offered of the notion of indeterminateness (or "becoming") that is uniquely appropriate to the special theory of relativity, in the light of a set of natural conditions upon such a notion; and reasons are given for regarding this conception as (not just formally consistent with relativity theory, but also) philosophically reasonable. The bearings upon Maxwell's program for quantum theory are briefly considered

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
928 (#60,872)

6 months
69 (#142,747)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Howard Stein
University of Chicago

Citations of this work

Nothing to Come: A Defence of the Growing Block Theory of Time.Fabrice Correia & Sven Rosenkranz - 2018 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag. Edited by Sven Rosenkranz.
Branching space-time.Nuel D. Belnap - 1992 - Synthese 92 (3):385-434.

View all 140 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

What is Life.E. Schrödinger - forthcoming - Mind and Matter.
Time and physical geometry.Hilary Putnam - 1967 - Journal of Philosophy 64 (8):240-247.
On Einstein--Minkowski space--time.Howard Stein - 1968 - Journal of Philosophy 65 (1):5-23.
Newtonian space-time.Howard Stein - 1967 - Texas Quarterly 10 (3):174--200.

View all 12 references / Add more references