- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
What about phonological facilitation, response-set membership, and phonological coactivation?
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):56-58 (1999)
Abstract
We discuss two inconsistencies between Levelt et al.'s model and existing theory about, and data from, picture-word experiments. These inconsistencies show that the empirical support for WEAVER ++ is much weaker than Levelt et al. suggest. We close with a discussion of the proposed explanation for phonological coactivation of near synonyms of a target wordOther Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Indirect representation of grammatical class at the lexeme level.Michael H. Kelly - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):49-50.
Syntactic representation in the lemma stratum.Holly P. Branigan & Martin J. Pickering - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):296-297.
Modeling a theory without a model theory, or, computational modeling “after feyerabend”.Arthur M. Jacobs & Jonathan Grainger - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):46-47.
Lemma theory and aphasiology.Carlo Semenza, Claudio Luzzatti & Sara Mondini - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):56-56.
Ambiguity, Competition, and Blending in Spoken Word Recognition.M. Gareth Gaskell & William D. Marslen–Wilson - 1999 - Cognitive Science 23 (4):439-462.
Which phonology? Evidence for a dissociation between articulatory and auditory phonology from word-form deafness.Giordana Grossi - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):290-291.
Strictly discrete serial stages and contextual appropriateness.J. D. Jescheniak & H. Schriefers - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):47-48.
Incremental encoding and incremental articulation in speech production: Evidence based on response latency and initial segment duration.Alan H. Kawamoto - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):48-49.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
216 (#187,019)
6 months
14 (#866,120)
2009-01-28
Downloads
216 (#187,019)
6 months
14 (#866,120)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: does the response set matter?Alfonso Caramazza & Albert Costa - 2000 - Cognition 75 (2):B51-B64.
Set size and repetition in the picture–word interference paradigm: implications for models of naming.Alfonso Caramazza & Albert Costa - 2001 - Cognition 80 (3):291-298.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation