Money is not everything: experimental evidence that payments do not increase willingness to be vaccinated against COVID-19

Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (8):547-548 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Rapid, large-scale uptake of new vaccines against COVID-19 will be crucial to decrease infections and end the pandemic. In a recent article in this journal, Julian Savulescu argued in favour of monetary incentives to convince more people to be vaccinated once the vaccine becomes available. To evaluate the potential of his suggestion, we conducted an experiment investigating the impact of payments and the communication of individual and prosocial benefits of high vaccination rates on vaccination intentions. Our results revealed that none of these interventions or their combinations increased willingness to be vaccinated shortly after a vaccine becomes available. Consequently, decision makers should be cautious about introducing monetary incentives and instead focus on interventions that increase confidence in vaccine safety first, as this has shown to be an especially important factor regarding the demand for the new COVID-19 vaccines.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-02-19

Downloads
71 (#832,650)

6 months
13 (#892,628)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Science, politics, ethics and the pandemic.Kenneth Boyd - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (8):529-530.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk?Julian Savulescu - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (2):78-85.

Add more references