Faith, Free Will Skepticism, and Fischer’s Tao

Midwest Studies in Philosophy 48:385-405 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Skepticism about moral freedom appears to be on the rise. This essay attempts to blunt the force of the recent growth of free will skepticism by appealing to a form of rational faith in free will. With a compelling account of the nature of faith (borrowed from Lara Buchak), we can see that even someone convinced by Pereboom-style skeptical arguments could nevertheless rationally accept and act on the claim that we enjoy moral freedom. Given an underappreciated aspect of P.F. Strawson’s famous paper “Freedom and Resentment,” this result should be less surprising than we might have thought. Further, this faith in free will should be especially appealing to those who have been moved by the resilience intuition that animates John Martin Fischer’s influential Semincompatibilism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-04-19

Downloads
108 (#456,689)

6 months
55 (#158,265)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Speak
Loyola Marymount University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Free will, agency, and meaning in life.Derk Pereboom - 2014 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Wrongdoing and the Moral Emotions.Derk Pereboom - 2021 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
My way: essays on moral responsibility.John Martin Fischer - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Free will.Sam Harris - 2012 - New York: Free Press.

View all 10 references / Add more references