Locke's empiricism and the postulation of unobservables

Journal of the History of Philosophy 23 (3):339-369 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The role of natural philosophy in the development of Locke's empiricism.Stephen Gaukroger - 2009 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (1):55 – 83.
Locke's Critique of Innatism.Raffaella De Rosa - 2015 - In Matthew Stuart, A Companion to Locke. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 157–174.
Kaila's Reception of Hume.Jani Hakkarainen - 2012 - Acta Philosophica Fennica 89:147-162.
Review of A Couple of Soles: A Comic Play from Seventeenth-Century China.S. E. Kile - 2023 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 143 (3):699-701.
Newton and Empiricism.Zvi Biener Eric Schliesser (ed.) - 2014 - New York: Oxford University Press USA.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
156 (#268,711)

6 months
48 (#177,099)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Soles
Wichita State University

Citations of this work

Sensitive Knowledge: Locke on Skepticism and Sensation.Jennifer Nagel - 2015 - In Matthew Stuart, A Companion to Locke. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 313–333.
Is Locke’s Theory of Knowledge Inconsistent?Samuel C. Rickless - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (1):83-104.
Locke on the Power to Suspend.Julie Walsh - 2014 - Locke Studies 14:121-157.
Locke on Knowledge of Existence.Nathan Rockwood - 2016 - Locke Studies 16:41-68.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references