The paradoxical relationship between morality and moral worth

Metaphilosophy 36 (4):490-500 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If the social environment were arranged so that most people in the West could, with relatively little effort, be morally good to a reasonable degree, would this be a good thing? I claim that it is not entirely obvious that we should say yes. This is no idle question: mainstream Western social morality today seems to be approaching the prospect for a morality that is not taxing. This question has substantial theoretical interest because exploring it will help us understand the paradoxical relationship between morality and moral worth

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral Worth: You Can't Have it Both Ways.Nomy Arpaly - forthcoming - Oxford Studies in Metaethics.
365Living with Paradoxical Ethics.Saul Smilansky - 2026 - In Paradoxical Ethics. Oxford United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the): Oxford University Press.
1What is Paradoxical Ethics?Saul Smilansky - 2026 - In Paradoxical Ethics. Oxford United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the): Oxford University Press.
Morality and Moral Worth.Saul Smilansky - 2008 - In 10 Moral Paradoxes. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 77–89.
Moral Worth.Euan K. Metz - 2024 - Philosophy Compass 19 (4).
What the Science of Morality Doesn’t Say About Morality.Gabriel Abend - 2013 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (2):157-200.
C20339The Ethical Advantages of Hard Determinism.Saul Smilansky - 2026 - In Paradoxical Ethics. Oxford United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the): Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
129 (#350,423)

6 months
18 (#615,045)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Saul Smilansky
University of Haifa

Citations of this work

References.Saul Smilansky - 2008 - In 10 Moral Paradoxes. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 138–141.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Oxford University Press USA.
Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals.Immanuel Kant - 1785 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Thomas E. Hill & Arnulf Zweig.
Famine, affluence, and morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3):229-243.

View all 17 references / Add more references