A natural explanation of the existence and laws of our universe

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):22 – 43 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The standard view of philosophers is that the existence of particular events within our universe is capable of being explained in terms of initial conditions and natural laws, but that the existence of our universe itself is a 'brute given' that is incapable of naturalistic explanation. A supernatural explanation of the existence of our universe may be alleged to be possible ('God created our universe so that humans may exist and the existence of humans is an intrinsic good'), but an explanation that appeals only to factors, situations or regularities in nature is deemed to be in principle impossible. It is also a standard view of philosophers that the less fundamental natural laws of our universe are capable of being explained in terms of more fundamental laws of our universe, but that the most basic natural laws of our universe are incapable of being explained naturalistically. Perhaps they can be explained supernaturally, by asserting that God ordained them so that humans may eventually evolve, but no other explanation is supposed possible

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
255 (#162,752)

6 months
48 (#177,387)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Probabilistic arguments for multiple universes.Kai Draper, Paul Draper & Joel Pust - 2007 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (3):288–307.
The Structure of Physical Reality.Matteo Morganti - 2018 - In Ricki Bliss & Graham Priest, Reality and its Structure: Essays in Fundamentality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 254-272.
Infinte Regress Arguments.Claude Gratton - 2009 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Is some backwards time travel inexplicable?Kristie Miller - 2017 - American Philosophical Quarterly 54 (2):131-141.
Ontic Structuralism and Fundamentality.Matteo Morganti - 2020 - In David Glick, George Darby & Anna Marmodoro, The Foundation of Reality: Fundamentality, Space, and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 69-86.

View all 20 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Statistical explanation & statistical relevance.Wesley C. Salmon - 1971 - [Pittsburgh]: University of Pittsburgh Press. Edited by Richard C. Jeffrey & James G. Greeno.
Aspects of Scientific Explanation.Asa Kasher - 1965 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (4):747-749.

Add more references