On Some Fundamentally Friendly Critics

Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-16 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article replies to critical responses by Douglas Husak, Marcia Baron, Grant Lamond, Mitchell Berman, James Edwards, Kate Greasley, and Carolina Sartorio to my recent book, Fundamentals of Criminal Law.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Causation and Free Will, by Carolina Sartorio. [REVIEW]Alex Kaiserman & Daniel Kodsi - 2019 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 13 (3):551-559.
The Lessons and Limits of Prison Abolition: Replies to Critics.Tommie Shelby - 2025 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 19 (3):511-523.
Revisiting Fair Opportunity: Ignorance, Injustice, and Control.David O. Brink - 2025 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 19 (2):343-358.
A Reply to Our Critics.Larry Alexander & Kimberly Kessler Ferzan - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (3):485-502.
Responses and Appreciations.Michael S. Moore - 2024 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 18 (1):217-252.
Reflections.Miriam Gur-Arye - 2024 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 18 (2):637-661.
On the ‘Specialness’ of the Criminal Law.Matt Matravers - 2023 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 17 (1):49-59.
Is Criminal Law ‘Exceptional’?R. A. Duff & S. E. Marshall - 2023 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 17 (1):39-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-10-24

Downloads
24 (#1,740,091)

6 months
11 (#1,040,448)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

How Omissions Aren’t Special.Kate Greasley - forthcoming - Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-14.

Add more references