Animal metacognition? It's all in the methods

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):353-354 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When animals choose between completing a cognitive task and “escaping,” proper interpretation of their behavior depends crucially on methodological details, including how forced and freely chosen tests are mixed and whether appropriate transfer tests are administered. But no matter how rigorous the test, it is impossible to go beyond functional similarity between human and nonhuman behaviors to certainty about human-like consciousness.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Assessing tests of animal consciousness.Leonard Dung - 2022 - Consciousness and Cognition 105 (C):103410.
Metacognition in animals: It's all in the methods.S. J. Shettleworth & J. E. Sutton - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23:353-354.
Pigeon parallels to human metacognition.Edmund Fantino - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):343-344.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
147 (#291,127)

6 months
16 (#744,928)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sara Shettleworth
University of Toronto

Citations of this work

Can Rats Reason?Savanah Stephane - 2015 - Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice 2 (4):404-429.
Metakognition bei Tieren.Julia Fischer - 2007 - In Jan-Christoph Heilinger, Naturgeschichte der Freiheit. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 95-116.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references