- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Social ontology and the philosophy of society
In Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence, Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and Their Representaion. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 3--17 (2007)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
John Searle’s Social Ontology: Comment to John R. Searle “Social Ontology and the Philosophy of Society” {Analyse & Kritik 20, 143-158}.Eerik Lagerspetz - 1999 - Analyse & Kritik 21 (2):231-236.
Collective Intentionality, Self-referentiality, and False Beliefs: Some Issues Concerning Institutional Facts: Comment to John R. Searle “Social Ontology and the Philosophy of Society” {Analyse & Kritik 20, 143-158).Bruno Celano - 1999 - Analyse & Kritik 21 (2):237-250.
On Some Difficulties Concerning John Searle’s Notion of an ‘Institutional Fact’: Comment to John R. Searle “Social Ontology and the Philosophy of Society” (Analyse & Kritik 20, 149-158).Carsten Heidemann - 1999 - Analyse & Kritik 21 (2):251-264.
‘On the Place of Artefacts in Ontology.Crawford Elder - 2007 - In Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence, Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and Their Representaion. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 33--51.
Artifacts: Parts and principles.Richard E. Grandy - 2007 - In Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence, Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and Their Representaion. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 18--32.
Animal artifacts.James L. Gould - 2007 - In Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence, Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and Their Representaion. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 249--266.
The essence of artifacts: Developing the design stance.Deborah Kelemen & Susan Carey - 2007 - In Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence, Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and Their Representaion. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 212--230.
Artifacts and human concepts.Amie Thomasson - 2007 - In Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence, Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and Their Representaion. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 52--73.
How to Refer to Artifacts.Hilary Kornblith - 2007 - In Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence, Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and Their Representaion. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 138-149.
Artworks as artifacts.Jerrold Levinson - 2007 - In Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence, Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and Their Representaion. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 74--82.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-26
Downloads
3 (#2,296,227)
6 months
1 (#2,183,676)
2014-01-26
Downloads
3 (#2,296,227)
6 months
1 (#2,183,676)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The subject of “We intend”.Hans Bernhard Schmid - 2018 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 17 (2):231-243.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation